Puplication Ethics

The International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies (IJPES) is committed to maintaining the highest standards of publication ethics and research integrity. The journal follows the principles and guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and adheres to internationally recognized standards of scholarly publishing.

All parties involved in the publication process, including authors, reviewers, editors, and the publisher, are expected to comply with these ethical principles.

Responsibilities of Authors

Authors submitting manuscripts to IJPES are expected to ensure that:

  • Submitted manuscripts are original and have not been published previously.

  • Manuscripts are not under consideration by another journal or publication venue.

  • All listed authors have made substantial scholarly contributions to the study and approved the submitted version.

  • Data, analyses, and findings are reported accurately and honestly.

  • All sources are properly acknowledged and cited.

  • Funding sources, conflicts of interest, and ethical approvals are fully disclosed.

  • Significant errors identified after publication are promptly reported to the editorial office.

The following practices constitute serious violations of publication ethics:

  • Plagiarism

  • Self plagiarism

  • Duplicate publication

  • Simultaneous submission

  • Data fabrication

  • Data falsification

  • Citation manipulation

  • Image manipulation

  • Authorship manipulation

  • Salami publication

Ethical misconduct may result in manuscript rejection, retraction, notification of relevant institutions, or other actions consistent with COPE recommendations.

Responsibilities of Reviewers

Reviewers play a critical role in maintaining the scientific quality of the journal. Reviewers are expected to:

  • Evaluate manuscripts objectively, fairly, and constructively.

  • Assess manuscripts solely on their scholarly merit.

  • Maintain the confidentiality of all manuscript related information.

  • Disclose any actual or potential conflicts of interest.

  • Complete reviews within the agreed timeframe.

  • Provide evidence based recommendations and professional feedback.

  • Notify the editor of any suspected ethical concerns or research misconduct.

Reviewers must not use information obtained during the review process for personal, professional, or financial advantage.

Responsibilities of Editors

Editors are responsible for safeguarding the integrity of the publication process. Editors are expected to:

  • Make publication decisions based on scholarly merit, originality, methodological rigor, and relevance.

  • Ensure a fair, unbiased, and confidential peer review process.

  • Protect the confidentiality of authors, reviewers, and manuscript content.

  • Manage conflicts of interest appropriately.

  • Investigate allegations of research misconduct promptly and transparently.

  • Take corrective actions when ethical concerns arise.

Editorial decisions are independent of commercial, institutional, or political interests.

Research Ethics and Human Participants

Research involving human participants must comply with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and applicable institutional and national ethical standards.

Authors must provide information regarding:

  • Ethics committee or institutional review board approval, where required;

  • Informed consent procedures;

  • Protection of participant confidentiality and privacy.

The editorial office reserves the right to request supporting ethical documentation at any stage of the review or publication process.

Artificial Intelligence and AI Assisted Technologies

Authors must disclose the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) or AI assisted technologies in the preparation of their manuscripts.

AI tools may be used for purposes such as language editing, grammar checking, translation assistance, coding support, or data organization. However, authors remain fully responsible for the accuracy, originality, interpretation, and integrity of all submitted content.

Artificial intelligence systems cannot be listed as authors or co authors.

Plagiarism Screening

All manuscripts submitted to IJPES are screened using plagiarism detection software before entering the peer review process.

Manuscripts exhibiting plagiarism, duplicate publication, or other forms of unethical overlap may be rejected without external review. Similarity reports are evaluated based on the nature, extent, and context of overlap rather than on a fixed numerical threshold.

Corrections, Retractions, and Expressions of Concern

When significant errors, ethical concerns, or research misconduct are identified after publication, IJPES may publish:

  • Corrections (Errata or Corrigenda)

  • Expressions of Concern

  • Retractions

Such actions are undertaken in accordance with COPE guidelines and international publishing standards.

Data Availability and Research Transparency

IJPES supports transparency, reproducibility, and openness in research.

Authors are encouraged to make research data, materials, instruments, and analytical procedures available whenever possible. Editors may request access to supporting data during the review process when necessary to verify reported findings.

Complaints and Appeals

Authors may appeal editorial decisions or submit complaints regarding editorial processes, publication ethics, or peer review procedures.

All appeals and complaints are handled fairly, impartially, confidentially, and in accordance with COPE guidelines.

Contact

Questions regarding publication ethics, research integrity, or editorial policies may be directed to:

Editor in Chief
International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies (IJPES)
E mail: ijpesjournal@gmail.com